Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-35204029-20180912094829/@comment-35030037-20180912163445

Admin here: I disagree, because then it'll just be a manner of basing monsters on judgement and opinions rather than cold statistical analysis. Now there's a potential way to make it the best of both worlds for both voting based ranking and analytical ranking, where the community itself votes their opinion on a monster's rightful rank, while the analytical side of the fanbase provides the information and statistics prior to allowing the ability to determine rank.

Also, take into account fake and troll accounts voting fantastic monsters tier E and the awful ones OP rank. That system requires trust within all voters to vote honestly and thoughtfully, something I've noticed our fanbase on this site somewhat lacks unfortunately. I could allow it, through I feel making it a subcategoty like the Monster Ideas category would be a nice starting point, similar to beta testing the concept before applying it on the main ranking system.