Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-24.115.216.27-20181208151236/@comment-185.253.98.62-20181208224254

that's funny. from my count there are at least 8 people who contribute regularly to this site and yet saulot has not been ranked until today. as maudy said a poll hasn't even taken place. well why not? im glad that some random dude placed him in a ranking because it spurred you guys to finally take action and place him at his appropriate rank. come on people up your game. place monsters in their ranks before their events are over and not long after.

i spend quite a bit of money buying gems for various events and it will cost me 480 gems to purchase 100 saulot cells outright (buying 2 chests of 50 cells each @ $4.99, my cost per gem is 0.0208 cents) but the cost will be much higher for those who don't buy gems regularly. so yeah...it is important that you rank new monsters as soon as possible especially if we have to use gems or cash to get them. people need to know if it's worth it to spend so much on a newly released monster.

for myself 480 gems for one monster is alot. for comparison a patient player can buy 100 monster cells for as little as 155 gems (well actually a whole lot less if they are extremely patient when buying cells) while those cells are on sale. is saulot worth the price of 3 monsters? is he really that good? i haven't decided whether to get him yet, but at least the information is there to help me decide. i'm sure many players are in a similar situation.

if the random dude hadn't already placed saulot in a rank i surely would have done so. but i would have placed him at ss+.