Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-25136728-20190908002538/@comment-29393109-20190908204342

"Yeah, when i said good players I wasnt talking about players with high levels. Who is a good player that only plays adventure map? Lol. I was referring to players that help or is known in the community (positively) some way."

I'm pretty sure he meant high level as in like XP levels or skill levels, not Adventure Map levels.

"I mean, If the responsibles for this page could let me in, I could help about this."

Well, when you meet the requirements for the Ranking Council you seem like someone who is worthy of being on it.

"I'm known in making analysis about most of new monsters in some latin groups (and people seem to like it. Also, this is the type of reference I'm talking about)."

Latin groups? :eyes:

"The Viability could take in consideration not only how good the monster is, but also how he is connected to win rates and usage. Wyrmlad for example not only is very good, but his usage and win rates are pretty pretty (pretty) which translates to meta."

I'm confuzzled, are you saying there's good Monsters with low win rates? rofl

"About the wars, it's true. You should consider all the possible restrictions that could make this monster viable or not viable. This is definitely a heavy work, I agree. That's why you should always consider expanding the team, since war is one of the most "competitive place" in the game. There are a lot of strategists around there about there to help this"

Yeah sounds reasonable, surely a lot of work given we have to think about all the restrictions and what Monsters you'd be up against and stuff, but it's doable.

"Also, Yeah Gulli. We should also consider opinions from another league to see what is the meta in those, although it's always very vast to organize tbh."

Guil*

Also I don't really think stuff like Silver League has a meta, nor is the meta in Silver relevant. I just said we shouldn't immeaditely throw out low skill players' opinions out the window because they're low skill players, as it's a very bad mentality that harms a community's growth.

"General Thetys better than Warspells? I didn't see this one, but, yeah.."

General Thetys is ranked at AA (which is 150% bullshit, Thetys is no higher than B and AA in itself is a bullshit rank, there isn't a single Tier List/Viability Ranking I have found that has AA, it's just A/A+ > S/S-) while Warspellz is only at A Rank.