Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-86.141.100.118-20191102085647/@comment-40157980-20191102163206

"You can't use 1 monster alone in a tier. Sure, Ragnarok is slightly better than Wyrmlad, but he's worse than everything else in the tier." First of all Eisul is worse too. Second of all, even if it was only better than Wyrmlad, that would mean Wyrmlad had to be in OP- or Ragnarok in OP.

Sure Thalassa and Sherezar are better than him, but just because you can use only 4 moves lmao. Fusion is incomparable as she's a Support, but Ragnarok basically is the one who can stop her (along with a SC: Mega Taunt user). But it's true Fusion talking about viability is better than him.

"...Eisul, which is another monster outclassing Ragnarok." tell that shit to Death Door, Demon Flames, No More Failures and Dwarf's Stomp.

"And you know what, just for an extra point for you, I'll shove Ugluk in here too. Ugluk wouldn't do so good, but overall, Ugluk is about equal to Ragnarok, just because Ragnarok would have to trait disable him first, and by then Ugluk could just delete him with Siege Finisher." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA LMAOOOOOOOO. Don't forget Ragnarok isn't a doll and he has a Trait, stats, and can attack Ugluk, Mines.

"So there. 4/5 OP Monsters outclass him, and we have an equal monster in OP-, meaning that he fits there. You need to see all the monsters in 1 tier, not just use 1 monster in that tier." Shit no. I haven't heard that kind of bullshit since Guil said Warspellz>Elvira, for the reasons I explained previously.