Talk:Grakon/@comment-44433317-20191227064004/@comment-36515094-20191230205139

"He is better than Crabbydroid imo and he’s in the OP- tier"

When the Ranking Council was discussing Crabby I voted for him for SS+, so for me Grakon is still SS+. Also, in terms of denying, both struggle with Taunt + Area Dodge, but if they face an Eisul + Area Dodge then Crabby has a huge upper hand on Grakon. Crabby needs just 1 turn to get rid of MT and Taunt with Palancar Beauty and then Lion's Mane. Grakon needs 2 turns to stop Eisul. Seeing as this combo is really common, Grakon will definitely have a harder time denying. This is a big reason for me saying SS+.

For Pro master:

"Crabby’s is much better because it isn’t anticipation bait"

Crabby is more anticipation bait than Grakon is. Palancar Beauty gives an extra turn causing the anticipation. Grakon may have more extra turn skills, but his extra turn skills honestly suck so there is no reason to really use them making him not worry about anticipation. So, Grakon is not anticipation bait, while Crabby is a little more anticipation bait.

"The only reason I’d see crabby as a bit better is because he is not only a very stable denier, but can also be run as a great attacker. He can deny while being an attacker with irukandji, eel charge, Portuguese man o’ war, and cannonball."

Crabby can't even be close to being ran as a great attacker, that would just be a waste of him. His power stat isn't that good, he is meant to be a denier, his skills don't deal that much damage, most of his skills don't even deal damage, and to even attempt to use him as an attacker would make you use skills that are worse than others. Crabby being able to be an ok attacker at best is not a good reason to say why he is better than Grakon