Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-85.242.252.228-20191024075306/@comment-85.242.252.228-20191024164206

Everyone here just literally missed the whole point of what I said. Ragnarok is mainly used as a support monsters, and most of his skills buff allies, so guess what, it doesn’t matter he doesn’t have AoE’s. He has AoE team skills that can replace them. ‘PER takes care of most of them easy’ what about the Heal, NER, revive, extra turns that are in his stongest skills. The trait disable skill is not even necessary to be good against taunt tanks. He has loads of other skills that work fine even if there is a taunt monster. People also didn’t seem to understand what I meant with my fourth point as well. All I was saying is that taunt monsters are usually paired with dodge areas. And that having no AoE’s is not a weakness there because, well, the dodge area would stop those AoE’s being useful anyway. PKA, death door is not a sub-optimal skill, it is great if you tune rag as a supporter (Where he is best, in my opinion) Also, people saying I can’t use top players in my arguament, I understand that you can’t just put a monster in OP because top players use him. What it does mean, however, is that they agree with me that ragnarok is one of the best monsters in the game, so I might just have a point here. I know you won’t really listen to me, but bonesaw, a YouTuber who I know at least some people on the council respect, says Ragnarok is one of the best monsters in the game, so he might change your mind