Talk:Lamia/@comment-44914052-20200130013203/@comment-44236525-20200130220439

Oh my god.

1. The most common of meta team comps is probably taunt/Santa+DA+Anticipation. This means that ‘attacker wyrmlad’ will get easily walled and the anticipator(usually Ragnarok, Hookuai, or Nisael)can destroy your strategy by reviving or cdaeing you or something. Lamia I can see as another monster added to this very good comp and she can just.....well....look at their skills and find out. It’s gonna be an ugly day when that happens.

2. Specific teams are usually meta team comps and certain meta team comps blockade certain monsters from shining, like for example, Rekka, who will get demolished. You can’t say that we only ‘value’ one specific team out of thousands when that team is more popular than like 25% of those thousands of other teams.

3. If you’re gonna run Wyrmlad with strength, then go ahead and do it. But Wyrm works better as an attacker/support hybrid or just support, not full on attacker. Monsters are valued at their fullest potential in their best roles, so if you’re saying that something someone else says isn’t relevant because you’re using a monster in a different way, that’s like saying a very good doctor can’t be criticized because he was just working at a grocery store for half an hour. Basically, Wyrmlad is run better in the way I said he was, which, as I stated previously, WASNT FULL STRENGTH.

4. The worst point I’ve seen from the argument so far. If you’re gonna evaluate monsters only on their 1v1 situations then that’s just....no. ML is a 3v3 game, it’s not like you’re always gonna be picking one monster to fight another, it’s a 3v3 game so u can’t say that something is wrong because the monster performs better in 1v1s, because the game isn’t about 1v1s.

Bruh moment argument.