Talk:Grakon/@comment-44433317-20191227064004/@comment-44236525-20191230200200

I personally think Crabby is a bit better as crabby can deal with mega taunt more freely. By utilizing palancar beauty(Removes MT), then Irukandji, you pretty much have removed whatever the enemy has and denied them unless it’s area dodge, but you have a TD+mega stun skill. Interestingly enough, Grakon has mega stun+ET, with no TD like crabby. Crabby’s is much better because it isn’t anticipation bait and trait disables, allowing crabby to deny a monster and then secure them while denying the other opponents unless there’s 2 NERs, which I doubt. It is a bad thing to have mostly AoE skills, but when you consider that you can just PER mega taunt then AoE deny or Td and deny the area dodge monster, then AoE skills aren’t as much of a problem, especially if you pair him up with draghar, thalassa, or ingenica. Pair him up with one of those and he’s almost invincible while denying. Grakon also has his upsides to crabby, while being able to deny in more forms, and kill the enemies with a ton of DoTs. The only reason I’d see crabby as a bit better is because he is not only a very stable denier, but can also be run as a great attacker. He can deny while being an attacker with irukandji, eel charge, Portuguese man o’ war, and cannonball. This set allows him to deny while dealing a ton of dmg with eel charge and cannonball. Grakon can deny and torture, cda, and such, but lacks as much PER, can’t really deal much with torture immunity, and has a trash power stat. Anyways, I just favor crabby, but likely grakon will be my denier in the future as he’s less P2W. My argument is confusing, I know, but if you can analyze the main points then tell me what you think.