Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-31073921-20180129170755

Talos = SS-

I gotta go with SomeGuy here, Talos is pretty good. Especially with Sentinel in S-, yeah yeah shame on me, his skill set is favorable.

"Nah he's definetly not that good, atleast not as good as monsters like Metalisha, Kihaku Samael the Fever Scatterer"

No way in hell I would favor meltisha over him, and putting him on A- was... a bit of an underestimate- ESPECIALLY for a top tier nemesis.

"Stats- Stats (not including the base) are beatiful. Awesome attack, Awesome Health and Decent speed. His attack power is very useful giving of damage."

Attack, good for him but not a priority.

Health, who even cares.

Speed, decent? His speed is seriously missing some 50 points to be considered decent, and speed IS the meta right now, so having decent, Below average *cough* *cough*, makes him ready to get knocked down by faster monsters.

"Trait- God aritfact which means he can counter Xiron and other op denying monsters along with flamerion timerion and tankerion"

You know, I would usually like artifact, but for him and flamerion... it's not that good of a trait. He is an attacker so not being able to receive damage buffs is really sad when he does 50 aoe damage on average. Plus, he has "awesome" health, so does he even need to be immune to status effects?

"I think Talos is hella disappointing"

Yep, didn't buy him because he kinda was. But comparing him to lucifire, also known as the bullshit cashgrab they shot out, is ridiculous. I didn't like him compared to my team and other things, but putting him on A- is really an understatement.

"85% of people on the internet get extremely butthurt and defensive when someone doesn't agree with their opinion"

mhm. When you provide an opinion on the internet do you just expect to not get criticism? SomeGuy is e x p l a i n i n g his point just like you, yes you PK, were e x p l a i n i n g your reasoning. Having an argument on how someone is butthurt, because they criticized you is 1st grade.