Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-36735225-20191218222323

Just asking, how much is team war a factor when ranking a monster? certain monsters are way worse in wars event though they are op in PVP, for example, raggy might be the strongest monster in wars thanks to the numbers of books his in and his versatilities, and wyrmlad and other dodge area monsters are nowhere as powerful since they can't always be with a taunt monster.

Another example is that nadiel the pyromancer is a really good monster in PVP, but he is undoubtedly one of the best if not the best for wars involving nature monster(when both of his dots land on nature, it removes 50%+ every turn, and that's not counting the skill is also fire-based) there are almost no monsters who can stand up against him(Zahra is one of the best counters to him in nature)

And lucifire the hopefreezer a fire attacker with water skills(kind of destroy all fire) and if you have a war perspective you might think hopefreezer is better than nitro blaster and is the best fire attacker but while in PVP it is nitro who is the best fire attacker

In the female book, there are 3 monsters immune to dots(yedra has trait, zahra and olnir has aoe sc) And that kind of make a lot of attackers there with a lot of dots skills worse(for example luci and helgudin)

Or does the council members only take PVP as the factor while wars decide on nothing/not a lot