Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-34912048-20200107021522/@comment-44521512-20200110121450

Forgot curser but other than that you're kinda wrong lol

Strength stat isn't 3600+ yes, but it doesn't reaaaally need to be. Stats aren't everything, movepool is more important, plus if you do wanna go on about her stats then it's not something ridiculously low like 3100. Her main role IS a support and i'm not arguing against that, but she is entirely viable as an attacker too. "Just because she has double damage..." yada yada yada what? Totally a reason why, you don't see that stuff on monsters that have no means of attacking do you.

What I explained is exactly how double damage works, it doubles the stat of that monster which will then in turn be the equivalent of, say, 35 becoming 70. Same principle, its just really easy to explain in that sense.

Don't give goran as an example because he isnt a high tier monster, not comparable.

Part that peeves me the most is you saying that she doesn't have any attacking moves. I still can't believe a simple thing like this gets overlooked. Take a look at 3 monsters that have been added from varying times in the game. Greedy dragon, Sting westclaw and Ursus. All attackers.

What do all of these monsters have in common? A move that gives them a damage buff and an extra turn. Greedy and ursus its +50% and sting is 100% with minor blind. Notice something else all of them have? Relatively weak attack moves to counter the above. Such as moves around the 30/35/40 aoe, and 60/65 in single target. Comparing to neobuki. Neobuki has the 35 aoe and 65 single target... But then paired with her MUCH MUCH BETTER damage buff extra turn move. See what I mean?