Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-29393109-20181229002626

Can I not get cucked by some "precaution against hijacking" bs again? Thanks.

So I've been looking at the Viability Rankings, looking at some comments, talking about it with some friends and I've come to the conclusion that a Viability Ranking of this scale DOES NOT WORK.

Why doesn't it work? First of all, there are over 380 Legendary Monsters in the game, that's way too many Monsters to Rank, second of all, the ML Meta is extremely volatile, on one day Thetys is arguably the best Monster in the g- oh sorry Hydratila exist- oh sorry Samael exists, Samael the Plague Carrier is the best Monster in the Gam- oh whoops Gortak, Barbael and Necromanc- oh sorry those aren't the best, Elvira exists- oh whoops sorry 50% glitch got patched Kihaku no longer has 3 AOE Freeze/Possessio- whoops Gelotron exists Xiron you better sit the fuck dow- oh sorry now we have Shademoon who is literally immune to AOE Skills, do you see what I mean? It takes too much effort to Rank every Legendary when every damn week the meta suddenly gets turned on its head.

"But if the Viability Ranking doesn't work and you can CLEARLY do better, what do you suggest?"

I would suggest making separate Viability Rankings for each category, one for Attackers, one for Deniers, one for Supporters and one for Tanks. It's a lot easier to maintain than a Viability Ranking with 380+ Monsters.

I'd like to see what everyone thinks of this idea, if you have any questions about the Separate Viability Rankings then feel free to ask!