Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-44521512-20191202161118/@comment-36735225-20191204211726

Bad stats, meh trait, high cooldowns and stamina costs. Kihaku is not viable.

Yeah thats what u said, not viable

Unlike other deniers, he still can do some stuff when he got cdad, and he can apply positive to his allies which is something not every denier have, also removing positive effects, a lot of denier such as sunblast and saulot does not have that, sure his positive effects can be remove by per, but so can every positive effects that raggy give get removed... its not really a con if it can get removed, its a pro if the positive can not get removed though, but surely its not a con if a positive effect can get removed.

And epikart, if u think the 2 0 cd skills u mentioned are viable... they are just bassically op, if u compare the best 0 cd skill by far, even compare to a good 0 cd skill the skill is going to look bad.

And even if the enemies have mega taunt, they maby can not remove the positive like kihaku, and again kihaku is not bad

I will like to point out how important per is, u honestly need it to survive all of the positive effects in the game, such as pierce, evasion, triple/double damage, life regen true vison.

He still can deny a lot of monsters in the game(with out control immunity, and such) speed again does not matter that much for a denier

There is also a weird fact i found about this wiki, so for example, super tomato is not a good monster, much worse than kihaku, no one hates super tomato but every one hates about kihaku.

Singularis, a monster worse than voltaik, no one say its bad, but every one say voltaik is bad...

Ok thats surely some biased stuff...

And at the end, since if u really think that kikaku is completly garbage why is he in a tier than(i think he should be 1 tier higher, not asking for a lot 1 tier higher...) if he is just that bad he should be in c tier or lower, and epikart may i ask u to chill down a bit?