Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-39230426-20190921152410/@comment-36515094-20190921201207

"Can I suggest two monsters that aren't SS+ worthy anymore? Al Canine and Wangzhou."

They definitely will be dropped

"what the heeeck... Yoshijr, you're clever, use your brain please: it's a really different subject, because Relics rarity is not the point. The point is that you need to equip that relic to make Warspellz viable (and although it's not too important, the fact that relic is rare doesn't help), and this is Monster Viability Ranking, not Monsters+Relics Viability Ranking."

My guy, I am. You just need to realize that since relics are such a huge part of the game now and can change the tide of a battle completely they can help a monsters be more viable. That's why a monster having good relic slots is so important. Also, like I said earlier, the viability ranking is based of a monster's full potential, which includes relics. That's why stamina drainers like hm I don't know, Wangzhou, aren't that viable. Relics stop them from being viable. Relics are why Wangzhou needs to be moved down (for the most part). That's why we take into account the Uriel Essence for Warspellz because it brings out his full potential (which is the point of the viability ranking) and because we take into account relics for other monsters like Wangzhou.