Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-36515094-20190223011410/@comment-85.9.20.130-20190224013044

Not a good idea. You might as well group all the top monsters in SS rank along with the S ranked monsters. Now that would not make much sense so why would grouping lower tiered monsters in a similar way be a good idea?

As we all know most people who play ML do not have the drive (committment) time, resources (gems, or real money) or luck (I got more than enough Dunn Ra tokens from Monster wood) to complete events to get the top tiered monsters. They would rather settle for the middle tiered monsters in each events and would prefer to keep their spending to a minimum. Therefore it is very important that we don't group all the monsters into several larger tiers. If Yoshi were to examine closely the description of each tier he would know that it is the best interests of ML players to have a thorough understanding of every monsters effectiveness in the meta game.

I like the recent rankings of top tiered monsters. I would have made most of the same moves if I was still doing it.

But I would have placed General Thetys much higher than General Atum. But that's only because she has done an amazing job for me over the past month and will only do even better once I rank her up a bit.