Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-38078818-20191223191144/@comment-36515094-20191224203859

"This is a great thread. The amount of responses alone supports this."

I agree with this. Good debate, good points being brought up by both sides. No disrespect from either side.

"Only thing i would say is that i dont like the "it wont matter" argument or the top player one. Trait, skill set, stats should be the argument, as that is always what viability is about right?"

I can see the reasoning behind this, but when talking about Tanks the "it won't matter" argument is a viable argument since tanks were made to just protect their allies from being denied. This will make it to where the Tanks end up getting denied and won't be able to use their skills. That's why skills don't have a huge part in deciding how good a tank is imo.

"I still think Santerion is better, but it’s clear no one will chamnge their mind so I guess we’ll have to see who’s better when they come out. If, after a couple of weeks more top players use santerion, he’s better and vice versa."

I agree, nobody will most likely change their mind, so let's wait. I have a feeling that 1 might be used in offense and the other in defense or there will be an even distribution of both of them