Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-29393109-20190810185736/@comment-40157980-20190810214149

"nah, Barbatos is complete ass. He has 3476 Power" Oh. I thought he has 3576, not 3476. Oh God... I completely retire my words about him. I'm so fucking disappointed.

"As for Fenrir, scroll a few pages back on this page and you'll find me arguing with someone else over Fenrir, tl;dr I don't think Fenrir is that good." well, pair him with Makugan. AoE Metal Weakness+Triple Damage (and stun immunity, so will be able to do triple damage for THREE TURNS)+Blades Queen, no one will survive a single blow. Maybe you can complete the team with a fast Denier and/or a CDDA user, and you surely win. Another Fenrir's pro is he has no cooldowns, in a full of CDA monsters metà. Finally, he has a really good speed for an old monster (like, Zizania has 3454 speed like Fenrir). Cons? He has mediocre power (3509, c'mon), TERRIBLE Trait (like Barbatos) and bad life (like 26000, it's trash). But he's a more than decent attacker because of his quiand a great Supporter (if your attacker is immune to stun obviously). I think it's quite underrated.

P.s.: "someone else" is Marco Bignoli, isn't him? Bcuz I've seen him more than once releasing I-love-Fenrir comments. Well, he's completely mad, like a Kihakultist but for Fenrir. We should call him a Fenreligious. Or maybe he's a level 35-40, idk hahahaha