Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-36515094-20191116015031/@comment-39644519-20191116024920

I don’t think we need to change it. That Yami guy who was on earilier today said that only Wyrmlad, Rag, and Thalassa should be in op, and get rid of op- completely. I think that’s a bad idea. There will be monsters that will be weaker than OP and stronger than SS+. He also severely underrated Sherry and Eisul. They’re are about the same level as well. I’m pretty sure that guy said at one point that he was mainly a war strategist. That’s the difference. We focus on pvp battles, not wars. The ranks would be much different if we did. I think our top ranks are pretty solid, and I think the Council is doing a fine job. He also said that it would be good to scrap the entire list and start over. That’s a bad idea. You all have a pretty good list of the ranks currently, and I think that would be a waste. This guy also said that Hobkin was garbage other than live duels (sure, not like aoe curse, life removal, stamina Regen, area dodge, etc is decent or anything), called Wildbird nothing special and that his skills were quite lacking

I don’t think we need to. Maybe make a few small changes (Imo Fusion should be OP-. She’s amazing on offense, trash on defense), but I think they’re fine.

Have they’re been a lot of other top players who have joined? I only saw that guy who was on earlier today. People like this guy are good to have on the discord, but A LOT of what this guy was saying I didn’t agree with, and I think some council members wouldn’t agree with some things he said either. I think we should maybe take their opinions into account if we think their points are good, but not rely on them too much.