Talk:Nisael/@comment-209.15.65.9-20200120193120/@comment-39644519-20200121114715

“Wake up dude, nisa got a 50% total life removal skill”

Wow. That’s so amazing. Not like Ragnarok has a 75% one or anything. Hornet has multiple 30-40% ones with other effects on them (making them much better than this move). Ugluk has an aoe 30 and a single 50, both of which come with shields to himself, better than a bit of stamina removal.

“Better damage output than Wyrmlad”

He’s a freaking supporter. His damage output doesn’t matter very much. It’s like Santerion, who has high damage skills, but no one smart would ever run him with strength runes.

“Skills are better too on Nisael”

Sure they are. Tell me, how exactly is NER, PER, and some bad status effects, along with attacks that only are good when you’re losing and do nothing when you’re winning better than NER, multiple PER moves, multiple good status effects, and more? They don’t. Nisael’s moves aren’t that great tbh.

I love how those are the only points you care to make. One about a skill that’s outclassed by other monsters, one about something that doesn’t matter to a supporter, and one that’s just wrong.

“ the prob with the coucil is they do rank in their head, they dont play with the actual monsters, so youd do well to listen to players who themselves do, right?”

First off, all but a few people in the council got Nisael, so your point becomes obsolete there. And also, if people who “have him” sounds this like and make up horrible arguments, I don’t think we should listen to them. We don’t need to hear crap like this. Also, it’s not hard to know what a monster does without having it. That’s what the pages on this wiki are for. I still can know what all the monsters I don’t have do and how they would perform