Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-44521512-20191202161118/@comment-44521512-20191206161821

Kyreum really didn't say much and I'm new to this wiki so I couldn't exactly place a judgement, as for Epikart just please grow up.

I feel the wrong point was taken from the point of wars being more important, it's about versatility. The lvl 115 kihaku / pumpseed, still referring to versatility, but I do understand why this isn't taken into account regarding viability.

I don't think its reasonable for epikart to assume im brown nosing purely because I disagree with the opinion, I hate constantly going over volt this volt that, but saying he is worse than a significant amount of aforementioned monsters like mindson is just stupid, clearly he isn't lol, not by any means. You could make the statement that they don't do the same jobs (attacker/denier) but this is why I talk about versatility. Deniers are more restricted in terms of how viable they are due to the types of opposing monsters, whereas attackers will always be much more straight forward. Doesn't MAKE them better, but does affect the overall usage.

Plus, I don't see why people that still own and use mostly level 100 monsters (Epikart, to my knowledge) think they know what's best about the game when they can't have been playing for much more than a year? Big brain moment