Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-44236525-20191229185431/@comment-36515094-20191230004710

Pro Master why ask us Eisul or Nitroblaster, when your gonna respond with a snarky comment after I try answering your question? Obviously from your reply it seems like you would rather have Nitroblaster. Literally defeats the purpose of asking the question lmao, but hey, what would I know, I'm the one that recommended you get Eisul...

But in all seriousness yes you want Eisul. The best tank in the game (better than Santerion dont @ me) is by far more useful then an above average fire attacker like Nitroblaster. Does Clipeum have Mega Taunt? Nope. Does Eisul have Taunt just like Clipeum and have Mega Taunt to top it off? Yup. He literally does what Clipeum does but better. Seeing as Eisul is really easy to rank up with Water cells and Elementium he is by far better than Nitroblaster. Yea Eisul needs to be rank 3 to get Mega Taunt, but at least he already has taunt unranked. So he is still useful and when he becomes rank 3 he'll be even more useful. Nitro unranked isn't useful.

It's pretty likely that you won't even get Nitroblaster ranked up and unranked Nitroblaster is honestly trash. He doesn't have access to his best skills or his best trait. Rn you're saying you don't have any viable Fire attackers, but if you get an unranked Nitroblaster you still won't have any viable Fire attackers. Nitroblaster is also gonna get even more outclassed extremely quickly making him by far less useful to you in the long run than Eisul who is still extremely strong.