Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-36735225-20190516171235/@comment-39230426-20190517142638

....... I'm gonna keep copy-pasting this till you diehard Wasper defenders understand.

"I hate explaining this over and over, just because we want a monster in any of the S tiers, DOES NOT mean that they're bad. Wasper's issue is that he lacks a lot of the power that newer monsters that would typically be released nowadays has. His highest power skill is Acid Spit, which is simply 55 base power. Not bad, just underwhelming. Wasper still performs fantastically in areas like the Sherezar dungeon and Magic Team Wars. But in the online Arena he's very underwhelming and easy to take down.

One massive issue I've noticed with Wasper is the classic 4-Slot Syndrome. He has a lot of good to great skills that one would want to have, but only 4 skill slots, so it's difficult to bring the best out with him. Once more tho, S+ is still a fantastic tier for a monster to be in. It DOES NOT mean that the monster is bad."

I'm gonna add on, do you know just how many monsters being in an S tier puts you above? It puts you above the F through C tiers, the B tiers, the ENTIRETY of the A tiers, and the tier we wanted to put Wasper in, S+ is even above both S- AND S. Like, that's well over 3/4ths of the legendary monsters in the entire game. Why tf is everyone defending Wasper and saying he needs to be like OP and shit? He has more issues than most of the monsters in the SS tiers, and his positives don't exactly outweigh the negatives to warrant him being higher than S+ in all honesty.