Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-29393109-20181229002626/@comment-34227132-20181229182500

I'm with Guil on this one. This ranking is beyond flawed. Saying that VoltaiK and Kihaku are anything beyond C Tier is like saying a fetus can kill a Megalodon. Not only are these rankings quiiite outdated, they're all bunched up. Like Guil said, it'd most definitely be better for you to rank monsters in different classes seperately, for example, an attacker tier list. You could list favorable and unfavorable pairings and match-ups, though it may add extra time, it'd help beginners choose monsters to pair with the ones they already have. This goes for rares, epics, legendaries, uncommons, and potentially commons. It would make the rankings more orderly, not the other way around. No, Guil isn't bullying you. No, he's not relying on profanity. You argue that Guil doesn't know what he's talking about, but the truth is you know as much as you think he does. Guil is, in fact, making a tier list of monsters with others' help, including my own. You say that it's too much work for him, but did you make those sets and rankings on your own? On the contrary, it is YOUR argument that holds no weight. You overexaggerate and make up statements, when you worship yourself like a non-existent goddamn king. You come off as overly condescending, rude, and completely foolish. I would like to tell you that this tier list is inaccurate, but repeating myself is not my style. I am completely taken aback by how you worded that comment. Please improve your behavior in the future. Goodbye.