Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-39230426-20190921152410/@comment-36515094-20190921224915

"first of all, monsters' full potentials include even Allies and synergies, but this ranking doesn't count them, do it? And I don't think Wangzhou gotta get dropped for Relics, but because of 0s moves, which are a lot. We shouldn't count Relics to judge a monster because this ranking should be a guide for beginners, which cannot use Relics like Uriel's Essence."

Including monster synergies doesn't involve just one single monster's full potential, it brings up a monster TEAM'S full potential. Those are 2 very different things. That's why we have recommended allies on a monster's profile. Relics on the other hand increase a single monster's full potential.

Decreasing Wangzhou's rank because of 0 stamina moves is not that great of a reason. Most monsters that have 0 stamina moves only have 1 and their 0 stamina move usually has a high cooldown. Some 0 stamina moves aren't even that good sometimes. If we were just taking this into account then he honestly might not have to be moved down. The thing that really hurts Wangzhou is relics. Stamina refilling relics literally destroy Wangzhou's game plan.

This wiki has never been a guide for beginners and it never will be. It's a ranking of how good monsters perform in the meta. The meta includes relics, simple as that. Relics should be taken into account when deciding a monsters rank considering they can affect a single monster so much.