Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-29393109-20191102190716/@comment-43507804-20191102192226

Oh christ, Apple, you're just repeating the same shit over and over again, so we're just going to repeat the same damn arguments.

Having no AoEs is a FUCKING HUMONGOUS con. Literally every single fucking monster without a single AoE move is in a tier considered shit for today's meta, except for Ragnarok and Fusion, who has a fuck-ton of extra turns to make up for it. Thanks to these extra turns, too, she is not fucked up by Taunt unless there is ALSO an anticipator, unlike Ragnarok, who has no attacks with extra turns, only support moves.

Sherezar being countered by Area Dodge, I have no argument against. He does, in fact, have a weakness to Area Dodge. Too bad he has literally nothing to do with Raggy's placement, and therefore does not matter in the slightest here.

Ragnarok does, indeed, have good support skills. Thing is, he'd only really deserve OP if he either also had usable attacking not fucked over by Taunt, like Wyrmlad, or more than about 2 or 3 support moves that affect his allies and not just himself. Good support skills alone is not OP worthy, plain and simple.

(Guil replied while I was writing this, btw)