Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-142.177.159.9-20191025002635

Ok enough with the fucking ragnarok fanbois. I dont want my first wm to have some stupid ass shitty fanclub. yes rag is a top monster but hes not the best in the game or one of the top 3 best. This is because:

He has no aoe moves. Now some fanbois think that this is the only reason the rc put rag in op-. This is not the only reason but its still a good reason because it makes him vulnerable to monsters with taunt. And yes rag has demon flames but demon flames is kinda a waste of a move slot. Yes he can also use death door but that drains a crap ton of stamina and rag will need relics in order to use it.

His trait relys to much on rng. I mean cmon is this even debatable? Although this does make him very dangerous in defense, it makes it risky on offense to.

Weak to PER. Because rag barely any hard hitting moves and no aoe moves hes not much of a attacker, so rag is more of a decent damaging support. While his ability as a support is very good, new monsters usually have good per moves. Because of this rag is just a good support. Now some people think hes the best monster in the game, but do they see thalassa? Sherezar? Both of them shine more in being a denier then rag shines in being a support. Theres also madam fusion who can just pave the way for your attacker by destroying your enemys team strategy. With madam fusion u could dominate a enemy team using just about any decent attacker. Oh and because of a maxed fusions trait, she will be safe from pretty much any denier. Because of this, rag isnt the best monster in the game because there are monsters that shine more then him in thier own roles, and they can completley change the tide of the battle.

Oh and heres another note to the fanbois who say rag should be op because every top player uses him. FUCK YOU. Like honestly why would we listen to top players who think wasper is the god attacker of the game and completly deletes any team with 3 strenght runes.

Any ways i guess thats all i gotta say.