Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-35204029-20180912094829/@comment-2001:4D80:0:60:801:200:0:1066-20180913011933

While I agree that the recent behavior of two individuals needs to be controlled they adjusted the rankings based on their perception that X monster is better than Y monster. I never got the impression that they changed the rankings just to mess with the rest of us. Say what you will about them and I have plenty of times.....at least they didn't wipe out the entire rankings or deface a monster's profile with profanity like that one individual...

I will say it again. *Sigh*. Metalhead is a great monster and should be ranked higher than A. But will I stop using him because he is not ranked higher? Of course not. That would be silly. The point of the rankings and I believe that MangoStarco has said this before is that the rankings is just a guideline for us so that we may have a better understanding of the monsters we have, their strengths and weaknesses and how we can better use them in combat.

I really don't understand how Al Canine can make such a large jump from S level ranking to SS+. Were we all wrong before? I don't have him so I cannot test for myself on whether he is really that great. I also have not faced many Al Canines. Anyway, the polling system will not work because there is no guarantee that everyone will take part. Also, I know many others who use this site but will not comment. They like their anonymity......and so do I. Any yet here I am mouthing away. Lol.