Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-36515094-20190223011410/@comment-36515094-20190224042943

Just putting an idea out there. The descriptions don't really fit the ranks at this point though. For example, it says for the A ranks that these monsters perform well in the meta and B ranks say they are very viable, but to be honest the monsters in B tier aren't viable unless you are just starting out. A tier monsters are barely viable as well. So examining the descriptions at this point wouldnt really help. They are a bit too outdated now. These descriptions were made when S tier first came out like 2 years ago, so they aren't very accurate. But like you guys said it probably wont work, but what can we do to try and fix it?