Are Monsters Being Ranked Wrong?

Are Monsters Being Ranked Wrong? Should monsters‘ ranks be changed now?—————————————————————————————————————————————————

In this Viability Ranking (Heck, even the epics), there are rankings that seriously needed to be changed. Take Tulekahju for example, with one con that is an opinion, and a great moveset with nice stats and a good trait: A S- monster at least. But, he is ranked in A+. A good ranking, but an undeserving one. This is the case for many monsters, and it has to change!

I feel like there should be a feature on the Viability Ranking page where you can re-rank Monsters whether the monster is new or not. You’re going to already to notice this, but there is a feature on the Viability Ranking page where you can vote to decide what rank a monster should be put in. But the monsters’ ranks though, the ranks are just.... wrong. Monsters need to be put in either higher or lower ranks. Like, why isn’t Fatid in the SS+ rank? Fatids rank is somewhat undeserving. I mean, yeah, this monster does have a low speed stat. But still, this monster can resurrect allies, and it can apply Bleeding and Poison to all enemies, while it can also heal itself a good amount, which is good! But no, it is in the SS rank. Like, WHY? Because of the low speed stat? Well, guess what? Just add speed runes! Problem Solved!

The Viability Ranking needs a bit of a rework, and to put monsters in ranks they deserve. Monsters get put in their ranks by voting, as said before. But if you are going to be one of the people that is going to vote to determine the monster’s rank, then there is only two things to say.  Vote right    .

-ExtraCheezy

-A Fandom User