Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-39644519-20191123015537

Okay, this is just my opinion, so feel free to disagree with me on this. When I look at some of the pages of monsters in this wiki, I see 4-slot syndrome listed as a con. Now, I don’t believe that it should be. Answer this: if you were theoretically given the choice between 2 monsters that were almost the same, except one had 4 slot syndrome (aka more good moves) while the other didn’t, which one would you choose? The one that has more moves that are good, obviously. I strongly believe that if a monster is better if it has a certain “con”, it really shouldn’t be a con. Sure, 4-slot syndrome can be an annoyance at times, but it certainly doesn’t harm the monster’s usability. And I think that while maybe it doesn’t have to be listed as a pro, it shouldn’t be a con, becuase it is better for a monster to have this than to not have it. It’s essentially just a surplus of good moves. Why wouldn’t having too many good moves be a good thing?