Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-35204029-20180912094829

I feel that we need a voted rank8ng system. The recent hanky panky with ratings, ... ehhrr ... spirited discussions and strong but unsubstantiated declarations (X is better than Y, for example) do not really contribute to the usability of the ranking. The current rsnkings are just set (or reset) by the last person active enough to do so. No motivation necessary. If the ranking was based on average vote (or anything taking input from multiple sources), rankings would be much fairer and, with time, much more stable. If there is interest, I am willing to help look into how this can be done