Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-86.141.100.118-20191102085647/@comment-36492818-20191102150239

I feel like I'm going to have a fucking seizure over that.

It's a decent point, just the spelling, grammar, and how long it is with repetition fucking hurts my head.

You can't use 1 monster alone in a tier. Sure, Ragnarok is slightly better than Wyrmlad, but he's worse than everything else in the tier.

Thalassa would fucking dominate him, because she is the best monster in the game. Ragnarok doesn't even come close to this title. Don't know why people think Thalassa < Ragnarok.

Sherezar vs Ragnarok would actually be a fun fight. He would have to remove the SC, but that would require ''Great Dispel. ''However, Ragnarok of course has Anticipation. If it was a 1v1, Sherezar would win due to superior speed and even if Ragnarok gets lucky with SC and gets Evasion/Skill Mirror, that's a 2/9 chance, so overall, Sherezar dominates him here.

Madam Fusion actually couldn't beat Ragnarok in a 1v1 due to being a pure support, meaning she does no damage. The only way Madam Fusion with a team could lose against Ragnarok was if Ragnarok was with Eisul, who is very viable in the meta, which is another monster outclassing Ragnarok.

And you know what, just for an extra point for you, I'll shove Ugluk in here too. Ugluk wouldn't do so good, but overall, Ugluk is about equal to Ragnarok, just because Ragnarok would have to trait disable him first, and by then Ugluk could just delete him with Siege Finisher.

So there. 5/6 OP Monsters outclass him, and we have an equal monster in OP-, meaning that he fits there. You need to see all the monsters in 1 tier, not just use 1 monster in that tier.