Talk:Warmaster Ragnarok/@comment-44191020-20191110233020

Why Is Ragnarok in OP-, and Not OP?

Ok, so recently, a lot of people have been complaining about the fact he's in OP-. It honestly gets annoying after a while. Especially regarding the new post regarding Innerativus, I really would like to clarify why he's in OP- and not OP.

Firstly, what makes an OP monster? Let's list out the current OP monsters ...

Thalassa, Sherezar, Madam Fusion, Wyrmlad and Eisul.

In my Opinion, Sherezar could be in OP-, depending on how you look at it, but there are many reasons to put him in OP (Which I won't talk about). Thalassa is simply a dictator, I don't need to explain her. Madam Fusion is a great monster all around, a mini Thalassa in many ways, but can pack her own punches. Wyrmlad has an AOE block positive and major damage reduction, as well as a game-breaking Ressurection skill that practically forces you to have a Wyrmlad to counter a Wyrmlad. Eisul has the best characteristics of any taunt monster - Trap relic and defense relic, as well as AOE curse, several deny skills and a MegaTaunt status caster, with the taunt as a trait! (No other taunter has this).

So what does Ragnarok bring to the table? He brings a Turn transfer, and a "like new" monster, an immune to control plus megastun, an extra turn res with double damage (Which can be anticipated), and another denial skill.

Now, is this great? Yeah, it's what puts him in OP- (NMF especially). But looking at the OP ranking monsters, he seems to lag just a little behind, and that's why he's in OP-.