Talk:Viability Ranking/@comment-85.242.252.228-20191024075306

So, as someone following this wiki for a long time, when I saw Rangarok moved down to OP- I was really surprised. Ragnarok is an incredible monster, and arguably the best in the game, and he certainly deserves OP. There are many other people who think the same (just look in the ragnarok comments when he was moved down) but most of the ranking council members are just dismissing their opinions like they’re not worth anything.

Firstly, one of the biggest things I’ve seen people use as a weakness is his lack of AoE’s, which makes him weak to taunt tanks. The think is, just because he has no AoE moves does not at all mean he can’t deal with the taunt trait. Firstly, he can do death door - one of the best moves in the entire game against tanks and instantly removes 75% life. Secondly, he can do demons flames, a trait disable skill, to remove the taunt. Thirdly almost all his other skills buff allies, so are not really affected by taunt. Ragnarok can skill turn transfer and heal, he can still ressurect with double damage and an extra turn, he can still apply skill mirror to all allies, he can still heal, remove negative effects, and apply evasion. He can still apply damage mirror and life regen, or he can give immunity to control. Really just because he has no AoE skills doesn’t make him weak to taunt. Fourthly, the biggest use of taunt monsters is with dodge area monsters, like Wrymald, O’Reilly, and the new Hornet. This meant that even AoE skills are bad against those teams. So basically, Ragnarok is not OP due to being weak against taunt monsters, when he’s not actually weak against them? So can he be moved up to OP??

Also, he is abuse by literally all the top 20 players in the world, I just checked. Why would he be used this much if he wasn’t that good?